Lecture-based learning can be challenging for students who have difficulties building mental models for the organization of new information, but providing them with diagrams and other supporting material in advance of the lecture can help them overcome these hurdles, suggests new research.

Teachers need to understand that providing illustrative diagrams and supportive material in advance can make a big difference in helping students grasp and lock in key concepts presented in a lecture. It can boost student learning power and recalling efficiency, especially for those who have difficulty in organizing bits and pieces of related information into a cohesive mental framework.

Some students are very good at building these mental frameworks on their own, but others struggle with the process, and it’s those students who will benefit most from getting extra support in advance of the lecture. It shows them a basic framework or model of the concept that they can begin building in their minds.

The findings show how success in learning can be linked to important individual differences in how our minds process information — differences that educators should consider. If instructors want all their students to learn the material, they need to realize there are differences in learning skills and present information in a format that works better for students with less-developed skills. If organizationally challenged students get the right advance support, they are more than capable of learning the material. The more advance support, the better is the result.

Research was carried out with some college undergraduates with no mechanical experience, listened to spoken explanations of how key components of an automobile braking system work together to slow a car.

Participants were divided into three groups, with some getting a blank sheet of notepaper, some getting bare-bones text outlines describing key concepts, and others getting more detailed overviews with embedded diagrams showing how brake shoes, drums and other parts fit together to complete the braking system.

All completed a psychological assessment rating the ability to build coherent mental representations of complex concepts — a cognitive skill known as “structure building.”

Based on research, structure-building theory suggests deep comprehension requires a two-step process in which learners must first identify and understand key terms and concepts and then grasp how these pieces fit together into a cohesive framework.

Skilled structure builders are adept at building preliminary mental frameworks for organizing information as its being presented and then layering other information on that foundation when it’s deemed to be relevant.

Unlike common reading comprehension tests in which participants may refer back to material presented in a written text, participants study were limited to what they could glean from the material as presented in the lecture, forcing them to rely on their initial mental constructions to answer subsequent questions.

Not surprisingly, participants who rated high on structure-building skills needed less support from outlines and diagrams. While high structure builders appeared capable of building mental models on their own, even they performed better on recall and problem-solving tests when provided with outlines or visual diagrams.

Low structure builders, on the other hand, needed every bit of advance support they could get. While simple text outlines provided during note-taking didn’t do much to improve their scores, those who received hand-outs with diagrams did much better on post-presentation problem-solving tests.

Both high and low structure builders took fewer notes when presented with supporting material, but the notes they took were of better quality and focused more on connecting ideas as opposed to verbatim transcription

Much research has shown that trying to write down every word in a lecture is a poor learning strategy because note-takers often focus mindlessly on capturing individual words and miss the meaning behind them. Notetakers who use this strategy usually don’t perform well when asked to freely recall content from the lecture.

Preliminary work suggests students with low structure-building skills are the ones who struggle most in classes based around large lecture-hall presentations.

Some educational experts argue that spoon-feeding students with detailed pre-lecture outlines inhibits learning because students are not as challenged and focused on the material as it’s presented. Learning is stronger when it’s hard, they suggest.

Others contend that learning is inherently hard and that it’s a mistake to make it harder by intentionally overworking scarce cognitive resources.

Expert researches argue on both arguments. They explain that the make-it-hard school may make sense for learners with high structure-building skills, since developing complex mental models comes easier to them and added rigor may help them retain more for the long haul. But for students who have difficulty constructing mental frameworks, making the lecture experience harder may simply result in a lot less learning.

Why do we see individual differences in structure-building abilities?

Some suspect that low structure builders have trouble sorting out what information is important to the model and what is extraneous. Others suggest a level of prior knowledge is necessary to effectively build a mental framework on the fly; that you need some grasp of the context to begin putting the pieces in order.

The key takeaway here is that providing learners with supportive material in advance of the lecture helps them build a comprehensive model of how each part of the system relates to the next. The important thing to realize is that there are learners who need more advance support to learn challenging concepts and teachers can initiatory help them.